Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dale of Green Gables's avatar

While a great keening was heard in the land on Friday following what was billed as a debate, the Imperial Court slipped us another one. SCOTUS struck down the 40-year "Chevron deference" doctrine precedent (Relentless v. Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo) and, in so doing, the Court majority, in its inimitable fashion, has again sown chaos and uncertainty as it did with Dobbs. Yet another example of zealotry or ideology preempting not only science and expertise but common sense. By curtailing the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer, as granted by Congress, and ruling that the courts (and it will be lower courts considering how few cases SCOTUS hears in a year) should rely on their own interpretation of ambiguous laws, the Court majority has effectively left the business community scratching its head. Business relies on dependable rules and procedures --- whether it agrees with them or not --- and now, the Court majority in its infinite wisdom, has knocked that into a cocked hat, by allowing unknowledgeable judges to decide what the laws governing these rules and procedures mean. Nothing less --- whether religion, reproductive rights, voting, and now business --- than a full out attack on the way we not only choose to, but the way we can, live our lives.

Expand full comment
Mark Raffman's avatar

It’s only June, FFS. If the Dems were a party bent on winning they would do what the Republicans do every day. “Biden won the debate! He didn’t look old, he looked wise! He didn’t flub any lines! He meant to do that! Trump is a felon! Biden won!” Instead they insist on feeding the Republican beast. Yeesh.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts