25 Comments

Okay, well-stated. Now I have a story to tell. When I was twelve or so, my mother moved my sister, myself, her friend Anita, and my father's sister Reva to a farm in a very rural part of Michigan. It was totally foreign to me. Anyway, one day my mother and Anita invited some people home for a visit--not sure how they met them, and we never saw them again, for cause. My father (who died when I was very young) was Jewish and his sister Reva was also Jewish. This came up in conversation. Our visitors had never met a real live Jew in person before, and they were inquisitive. "What do you call yourselves? Jew is an insult, so...." Or words to that effect. I remember the feeling I had more than the words. Well, what DO we call ourselves? We call ourselves Jews, regardless of the ignorance or bigotry of others. Arabs call themselves Arabs. The problem (usage or otherwise) is not in the name that people use to identify themselves. It is ignorance. It is bigotry. What I say is no knuckling under to either.

Expand full comment
founding

Now that The Gene Pool "adult swim" whistle has blown, those of you who have chosen instead to invest in other means of self-flagellation, will very likely receive an email asking you to select from a long list of reasons why you decided against taking advantage of the enlightenment opportunity of a lifetime. These reasons tend to be of the "don't like the font," or "wrong size," variety and never really get to the underlying motivations for a declination. So, in the interest of actionable market research, I offer the following justifications (feel free to add your own):

* Can't compete week in and week out with Gene's and Pat's love children

* There is not as much discussion of bodily functions and fluids as expected

* I am still "Most Likely to be Amusing" whether Pat & Gene agree with my yearbook superlative or not

* Pat and Gene hate me. I can hear it in their posts. (And by the way, I can't stand moustaches or tiaras)

* I am distantly related to the Romanovs and am offended by the appropriation of my birthright

* I thought this was the David Sedaris website

Expand full comment
founding

Gene, I remember entering the NY Mag contest that asked you to "string names and names of things together in a 25-item list that would return to the original name through clever associations." (Although I remember it being only 10 items.) In addition to printing the winning answers in full, they printed bits from lists that they considered clever -- and they included a very brief bit from mine: "Bluebeard, Percy Kilbride. . . "

Expand full comment

Commanders is not a great name, but it could have been worse. It's been my experience as a logo designer for 45 years that any decision like that made by committee results in the winner being everyone's third choice. A colleague once tried to outsmart that inevitable outcome by submitting two terrible choices along with the obviously best one. Guess how that turned out.

Expand full comment

I'm sure we'll mention this next week, but just to let you know how the subscription thing going to work with Invite entries:

If you're not a paid subscriber, you'll still be able to fill out the entry form for the contest and send in your jokes. But we'll have the list of email addresses for paid subscribers, and if your email address isn't on that list, we won't use your entries.

If for some reason you need to send in an entry on a different email from the one that's linked to your Substack account, just explain that to me, tell me what the right account is, and that's fine. As long as you're subscribed. We're still small enough that we can handle it manually.

Expand full comment

Just sayin'....entering the SI by snail mail might take a month. Fax would only take a day and a half to track down a fax machine and another 20 or 30 minutes to transmit.

Expand full comment

Okay, I'm a little lost. What's the issue with "Arab?" Arabs are people from countries, mostly North Africa, where people speak Arabic. Is there some other word that the questioner prefers?

Expand full comment

Here's a recent Massachusetts high court decision on that state's version of the First Amendment that is well worth a read. https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2023/03/07/k13284.pdf. It's a rare situation in which the person who brought Hitler into the conversation won. Here are some excerpts:

The provision also has a distinct, identifiable history and

a close connection to public participation in town government

that is uniquely informative in this case. As more fully

explained infra, art. 19 reflects the lessons and the spirit of

the American Revolution. The assembly provision arose out of

fierce opposition to governmental authority, and it was designed

to protect such opposition, even if it was rude, personal, and

disrespectful to public figures, as the colonists eventually were

to the king and his representatives in Massachusetts.

* * *

Taking the facts, including the video recording, in the

light most favorable to the plaintiffs, Barron exercised her

constitutional right under arts. 19 and 16 to address the

meeting of the board and complain about the open meeting law

violations. Her comparison between Kolenda and Hitler was, at

least in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, simply

hyperbole, describing Kolenda as behaving in a dictatorial

manner, that is, domineering or authoritarian. Although a

comparison to Hitler is certainly rude and insulting, it is

still speech protected by art. 16.1

Expand full comment
founding

I felt that vetting the pokes would be difficult. I considered using my archival searches from my now-discounted Washington Post subscription to find the prior Below the Beltway articles in which they appeared. Then, I thought even I'm not that obsessive.

Expand full comment

If a national divorce or separation did happen, the red countries would ABSOLUTELY institute Jim Crow laws again, as well as the laws outlined in The Handmaid's Tale, and mandatory conversion camps for Queer and Trans people.

Expand full comment