Good News!
We get to flush him!
This spasm of anticipated joy was occasioned by a story today in The Atlantic about how Trump has been spreading his ugly mug all over town, trying to make his mighty works indelible in history. This reignited in me the delightful certainty of how swiftly this maggot will be unremembered and dismembered once he has waddled away into the sunset.
We will expunge him!
Do you realize the relish we will all take in his removal…
… and subsequent excretion?
That’s really all I have to say today. I realize many of you will be appalled by this column, and I promise that, in penance, I will use AI less frequently for a while.
—
Meanwhile, speaking of maggotry, I’d like to introduce you to a headline from today’s Washington Post’s Opinions section. Here it comes. Ready?
Todd Blanche is right about DOJ ‘independence,’ like it or not
The attorney general’s department is supervised by the president.
—
Yep, it actually tries to make that case.
It also lionizes Bill Barr, attorney general in Trump’s first term, for his ethics. This is the same Bill Barr who famously leapt ahead of the news curve and deceitfully mischaracterized the Mueller Report, shaping coverage in Trump’s favor. And who ignored his underlings’ advice and was absurdly lenient on Trump crony and convicted felon Roger Stone. And who marched with Trump through a Lafayette Square that had been strong-arm cleared of people who were protesting the regime’s police brutality and racial injustice, so his boss could get a phony sanctimonious photo-op holding a Bible in front of a church.
—
Today’s Gene Pool Gene Poll:
—
And finally, remember what Abraham Lincoln once said: “A vote for Weingarten is a vote against Trump.”
The only good thing to come out of the desecrated Post opinion pages is the delightfully honest AI summary of the reader comments, which demonstrate decisively how ineffective The Post has been in attracting right-wing readers. The comments ALWAYS overwhelmingly express outrage with the current/recent Post editorial board and its choices. This summary reflects the 933 comments so far.
"The conversation explores strong criticism of the opinion piece, with participants expressing concern over the perceived erosion of democratic principles and the independence of the Department of Justice (DOJ). Many comments highlight the dangers of a president using the DOJ for personal or political gain, arguing that the DOJ should uphold the Constitution rather than serve the president's personal interests. There is a recurring theme of disappointment with the Washington Post's editorial board, with accusations of enabling authoritarianism and compromising journalistic integrity. Commenters also emphasize the importance of maintaining a separation between the executive branch and the DOJ to prevent the misuse of power."
He’s the worst and number two!! He’s the five worst presidents in the history of our country!!