In a perfect world there would be no need for newspaper endorsements. People would read and think critically and arrive at their own informed decisions. But that’s not our world. A newspaper’s endorsement often makes people’s decisions for them. And for a newspaper to fail to endorse—thereby implying that Harris and Trump are equally acc…
In a perfect world there would be no need for newspaper endorsements. People would read and think critically and arrive at their own informed decisions. But that’s not our world. A newspaper’s endorsement often makes people’s decisions for them. And for a newspaper to fail to endorse—thereby implying that Harris and Trump are equally acceptable candidates—is beyond irresponsible, not to mention unbelievably cowardly. Shame on them.
In a perfect world there would be no need for newspaper endorsements. People would read and think critically and arrive at their own informed decisions. But that’s not our world. A newspaper’s endorsement often makes people’s decisions for them. And for a newspaper to fail to endorse—thereby implying that Harris and Trump are equally acceptable candidates—is beyond irresponsible, not to mention unbelievably cowardly. Shame on them.
liked because of "thereby implying that Harris and Trump are equally acceptable candidates"--because that's what it does