Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hortense of Gotham City's avatar

That truck-nuts Wikipedia entry is great. My favorite parts:

"In 2011, a 65-year-old South Carolina woman was ticketed by the town's police chief for obscenity displaying truck nuts on her pickup.[6][7][8][9] The case, originating in Bonneau, South Carolina (population approximately 480), was pending jury trial on her $445 traffic ticket. The case was continued three times and no new trial date was set.[10] According to the Above the Law legal analysis blog, the ban was discussed in the ABA Journal and presents constitutional freedom of speech questions.[11]"

And:

"The stated position of the Honolulu Police Department on obscene decor on vehicles, such as 'exaggerated male genitals hung from rear bumpers', as stated in 2013 by their city corporation counsel's office, is that '[it] may be tasteless but it's protected as free speech.'[12]"

Expand full comment
Dale of Green Gables's avatar

I'll assume by the way it's framed that the hypothetical in Q&A about the publication of a collage of aborted fetuses is for discussion purposes and not the usual rabid right attempt at deflection and false equivalency --- although, it was clearly prompted by the WaPo article on the carnage inflicted by easily obtained AR-15s and similar semi-automatic long guns. There is nothing even vaguely equivalent about extremely rare legal terminations later in pregnancy (1% of abortions occur at or after 21 weeks), overwhelmingly for medical reasons --- and the willful, premeditated murder of many in seconds by a single shooter. Unless, of course, secular law is somehow considered irrelevant. Beyond the issue of consent raised directly by Ted Dreyer here and obliquely in Gene's answer --- which is a legal consideration even for the release of law enforcement crime scene images --- the purpose of the image(s) and the article itself would raise serious questions about journalistic integrity. Simply labeling an abortion "late term" is meaningless and is, in fact, considered to have no medical meaning by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. So, such an article would simply be propaganda and the image(s) providing nothing but cheap, cynical shock value --- hardly "courageous journalism," let alone responsible journalism.

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts